• Home
  • Why the Regarp Book Blog?
  • About the Reviewer
  • Index by Subject
  • Podcasts
  • Visuals: The Regarp Library
  • Current Reads
  • Reading List
  • Contact
  • Links

Regarp Book Blog

~ Reviews & Essays

Regarp Book Blog

Author Archives: stanprager

PODCAST Review of: Chemistry for Breakfast: The Amazing Science of Everyday Life, by Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim

27 Wednesday Apr 2022

Posted by stanprager in https://regarp.com/regarp-bookblogpod/

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Book Reviews, Books, Regarp, Stan Prager

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-a5nff-121094f

Review of:  Chemistry for Breakfast: The Amazing Science of Everyday Life, by Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim

Reviewed by Stan Prager, Regarp Book Blog

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Review of: Chemistry for Breakfast: The Amazing Science of Everyday Life, by Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim

Featured

Posted by stanprager in Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Is your morning coffee moving? Is there a particle party going on in your kitchen? What makes for a great-tasting gourmet meal? Does artificial flavoring really make a difference? Why does mixing soap with water get your dishes clean? Why do some say that “sitting is the new smoking?” How come one beer gives you a strong buzz but your friend can drink a bottle of wine without slurring her words?  When it comes to love, is the “right chemistry” just a metaphor? And would you dump your partner because he won’t use fluoridated toothpaste?

All this and much more makes for the delightful conversation packed into Chemistry for Breakfast: The Amazing Science of Everyday Life, by Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim, a fun, fascinating, and fast-moving slender volume that could very well turn you into a fan of—of all things—chemistry! This cool and quirky book is just the latest effort by the author—a real-life German chemist who hosts a YouTube channel and has delivered a TED Talk—to combat what she playfully dubs “chemism:” the notion that chemistry is dull and best left to the devices of boring nerdy chem-geeks! One reason it works is because Nguyen-Kim is herself the antithesis of such stereotypes, coming off in both print and video as a hip, brilliant, and articulate young woman with a passion for science and for living in the moment.

I rarely pick up a science book, but when I do, I typically punch above my intellectual weight, challenging myself to reach beyond my facility with history and literature to dare to tangle with the intimidating realms of physics, biology, and the like. I often emerge somewhat bruised but with the benefit of new insights, as I did after my time with Sean Carroll’s The Particle at the End of the Universe and Bill Schopf’s Cradle of Life. So it was with a mix of eagerness and trepidation that I approached Chemistry for Breakfast.

But this proved to be a vastly different experience! Using her typical day as a backdrop—from her own body’s release of stress hormones when the alarm sounds to the way postprandial glasses of wine mess with the neurotransmitters of her guests—Nguyen-Kim demonstrates the omnipresence of chemistry to our very existence, and distills its complexity into bite-size concepts that are easy to process but yet never dumbed-down. Apparently, there is a particle party going on in your kitchen every morning, with all kinds of atoms moving at different rates in the coffee you’re sipping, the mug in your hand, and the steam rising above it. It’s all about temperature and molecular bonds.  In a chapter whimsically entitled “Death by Toothpaste,” we find out how chemicals bond to produce sodium fluoride, the stuff of toothpaste, and why that not only makes for a potent weapon against cavities, but why the author’s best buddy might dump her boyfriend—because he thinks fluoride is poison! There’s much more to come—and it’s still only morning at Mai’s house …

As a reader, I found myself learning a lot about chemistry without studying chemistry, a remarkable achievement by the author, whose technique is so effective because it is so unique. Fielding humorous anecdotes plucked from everyday existence, Mai’s wit is infectious, so the “lessons” prove entertaining without turning silly. I love to cook, so I especially welcomed her return to the kitchen in a later chapter. Alas, I found out that while I can pride myself on my culinary expertise, it all really comes down to the way ingredients react with one another in a mixing bowl and on the hot stove.  Oh, and it turns out that despite the fearmongering in some quarters, most artificial flavors are no better or worse than natural ones. Yes, you should read the label—but you have to know what those ingredients are before you judge them healthy or not.

Throughout the narrative, Nguyen-Kim conveys an attractive brand of approachability that makes you want to sit down and have a beer with her, but unfortunately she can’t drink:  Mai, born of Vietnamese parents, has inherited a gene mutation in common with a certain segment of Asians which interferes with the way the body processes alcohol, so she becomes overly intoxicated after just a few sips of any strong drink. She explains in detail why her “broken” ALDH2 enzyme simply will not break down the acetaldehyde in the glass of wine that makes her guests a little tipsy but gives her nausea, a rapid-heartbeat, and sends a “weird, lobster-red tinge” to her face.  Mai’s issue with alcohol reminded me of recent studies that revealed the reason that some people of northern European ancestry always burn instead of tan at the beach is due to faulty genes that block the creation of melanin in response to sun exposure. This is a strong underscore that while race is of course a myth that otherwise communicates nothing of importance about human beings, in the medical world genetics has the potential of serving as a powerful tool to explain and treat disease.  As for Mai, given the overall health risks of alcohol consumption, she views her inability to drink as more of a blessing than a curse, and hopes to pass her broken gene on to her offspring!

The odds that I would ever deliberately set out to read a book about chemistry were never that favorable.  That I would do so and then rave about the experience seemed even more unlikely.  But here we are, along with my highest recommendations. Mai’s love of science is nothing less than contagious. If you read her work,  I can promise that not only will you learn a lot, but you will really enjoy the learning process. And that too, I suppose, is chemistry!

 

[Note: I read an Advance Reader’s Copy of this book as part of an early reviewer’s program]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

PODCAST Review of The Lost Founding Father: John Quincy Adams and the Transformation of American Politics, by William J. Cooper

06 Sunday Mar 2022

Posted by stanprager in https://regarp.com/regarp-bookblogpod/

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

American Hist..., Book Reviews, Books, Presidents, Regarp

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-ci69s-11c41f3

Review of  The Lost Founding Father: John Quincy Adams and the Transformation of American Politics, by William J. Cooper

Reviewed by Stan Prager, Regarp Book Blog

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Review of: The Lost Founding Father: John Quincy Adams and the Transformation of American Politics, by William J. Cooper

Featured

Posted by stanprager in Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Until Jimmy Carter came along, there really was no rival to John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) as best ex-president, although perhaps William Howard Taft earns honorable mention for his later service as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.  Carter—who at ninety-seven still walks among us as this review goes to press—has made his reputation as a humanitarian outside of government after what many view as a mostly failed single term in the White House. Adams, on the other hand, whose one term as the sixth President of the United States (1825-29) was likewise disappointing, managed to establish a memorable outsize official legacy when he returned to serve his country as a member of the House of Representatives from 1831 until his dramatic collapse at his desk and subsequent death inside the Capitol Building in 1848. Freshman Congressman Abraham Lincoln would be a pallbearer.

Like several of the Founders whose own later presidential years were troubled, including his own father, John Quincy had a far more distinguished and successful career prior to his time as Chief Executive. But quite remarkably, unlike these other men—John Adams, Jefferson, Madison—who lingered in mostly quiet retirement for decades beyond their respective tenures, in his long career John Quincy Adams could be said to have equaled or surpassed his accomplished pre-presidential service as diplomat, United States Senator, and Secretary of State, returning as just a simple Congressman from Massachusetts who was to be a giant in antislavery advocacy. Adams remains the only former president elected to the House, and until George W. Bush in 2001, the only man who could claim his own father as a fellow president.

Notably, the single unsatisfactory terms that he and his father served in the White House turned out to be bookends to a significant era in American history: John Adams was the first to run for president in a contested election (Washington had essentially been unopposed); his son’s tenure ended along with the Early Republic, shattered by the ascent of Jacksonian democracy. But if the Early Republic was no more, it marked only the beginning of another chapter in the extraordinary life of John Quincy Adams. And yet, for a figure that carved such indelible grooves in our nation’s history, present at the creation and active well into the crises of the antebellum period that not long after his death would threaten to annihilate the American experiment, it remains somewhat astonishing how utterly unfamiliar he remains to most citizens of the twenty-first century.

Prominent historian William J. Cooper seeks to remedy that with The Lost Founding Father: John Quincy Adams and the Transformation of American Politics (2017), an exhaustively researched, extremely well-written, if dense study that is likely to claim distinction as the definitive biography for some years to come. Cooper’s impressive work is old-fashioned narrative history at its best. John Quincy Adams is the main character, but his story is told amid the backdrop of the nation’s founding, its evolution as a young republic, and its descent to sectional crises over slavery, while many, at home and abroad, wondered at the likelihood of its survival. It is not only clever but entirely apt that in the book’s title the author dubs his subject the “Lost Founding Father.”

Some have called Benjamin Franklin the “grandfather of his country.” Likewise, John Quincy Adams could be said to be a sort of “grandson.” He was not only to witness the tumultuous era of the American Revolution and observe John Adams’ storied role as a principal Founder, he also accompanied his father on diplomatic missions to Europe while still a boy, and completed most of his early education there.  Like Franklin, Jefferson, and his father, he spent many years abroad during periods of fast-moving events and dramatic developments on American soil that altered the nation and could prove jarring upon return. Unlike the others, his extended absence coincided with his formative years; John Quincy grew up not in New England but rather in France, the Netherlands, Russia, and Great Britain, and this came to deeply affect him.

A brooding intellectual with a brilliant mind who sought solitude over society, dedicated to principle above all else, including loyalty to party, the Adams that emerges in these pages was a socially awkward workaholic subject to depression, blessed with a wide range of talents that ranged from the literary to languages to the deeply analytical, but lacking even the tiniest vestige of charisma.  He strikes the reader as the least suitable person to ever aspire to or serve as president of the United States. A gifted writer, he began a diary when he was twelve years old that he continued almost without interruption until shortly before his death. He frequently expressed dismay at his inability to keep up with his ambitious goals for daily diary entries that often ran to considerable length.

There is much in the man that resembles his father, also a principled intellect, whom he much admired even while he suffered a sense of inadequacy in his shadow. Both men were stubborn in their ideals and tended to alienate those who might otherwise be allies. While each could be self-righteous, John Adams was also ever firmly self-confident in a way that his son could never match. Of course, in his defense, the younger man not only felt obligated to live up to a figure who was a titan in the public arena, but he lacked a wife that was cut from the same cloth as his mother, with whom he had a sometimes-troubled relationship.

Modern historians have made much of the historic partnership that existed, mostly behind the scenes, between John and Abigail Adams; in every way except eighteenth century mores she seems his equal. John Quincy, on the other hand, was wedded to Louisa Catherine, a sickly woman given to fainting spells and frequent migraines whose multiple miscarriages coupled with the loss of an infant daughter certainly triggered severe psychological trauma. A modern audience can’t help but wonder if her many maladies and histrionics were not psychosomatic. At any rate, John Quincy treated his wife and other females he encountered with the patronizing male chauvinism typical of his times, so it is dubious that if he instead found an Abigail Adams at his side, he could have flourished in her orbit the way his father did.

Although Secretary of State John Quincy Adams was largely the force that drove the landmark “Monroe Doctrine” and other foreign policy achievements of the Monroe Administration, most who know of Adams tend to know of him only peripherally, through his legendary political confrontation with the far more celebrated Andrew Jackson. That conflict was forged in the election of 1824. The Federalist Party, scorned for threats of New England secession during the War of 1812, was essentially out of business. James Monroe was wrapping up his second term in what historians have called the “Era of Good Feelings” that ostensibly reflected a sense of national unity controlled by a single party, the Democratic-Republicans, but there were fissures, factions, local interests, and emerging coalitions beneath the surface. In the most contested election to date in the nation’s history, John Quincy, Andrew Jackson, Henry Clay, and William Crawford were chief contenders for the highest office. While Jackson received a plurality, none received a majority of the electoral votes, so as specified in the Constitution the race was sent to the House for decision. Crawford had suffered a devastating stroke and was thus out of consideration. Adams and Clay tended to clash, but both were aligned on many national issues, and Jackson was rightly seen as a dangerous demagogue. Clay threw his support to Adams, who became president. Jackson was furious, even more so when Adams later named Clay Secretary of State, which was then seen as a sure steppingstone to the presidency, something that further enraged Jackson, who branded his appointment by Adams a “Corrupt Bargain.” As it turned out, while Adams prevailed, his presidency was marked by frustration, his ambitious domestic goals stymied by Congress. In a run for reelection, he was dealt a humiliating defeat by Jackson, who headed the new Democratic Party. The politics of John Quincy Adams and the Early Republic went extinct.

While evaluating these two elections, it’s worth pausing here to emphasize John Quincy’s longtime objection to the nefarious if often overlooked impact of the three-fifths clause in the Constitution, which granted southern slaveholding states outsize political clout by counting an enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of representation. This was to prove significant, since the slave south claimed a disproportionate share of national political power when it came to advancing legislation or, for that matter, electing a president.  He found focus on this issue while Secretary of State in the debate that swirled around the Missouri Compromise of 1820, concluding that:

The bargain in the Constitution between freedom and slavery had conveyed to the South far too much political influence, its base the notorious three-fifths clause, which immorally increased southern power in the nation … the past two decades had witnessed a southern domination that had ravaged the Union … he emphasized what he saw as the moral viciousness of that founding accord. It contradicted the fundamental justification of the American Revolution by subjecting slaves to oppression while privileging their masters with about a double representation.  [p174]

This was years before he was himself to fall victim to the infamous clause. As underscored by historian Alan Taylor in his recent work, American Republics (2021), the disputed election of 1824 would have been far less disputed without the three-fifths clause, since in that case Adams would have led Andrew Jackson in the Electoral College 83 to 77 votes, instead of putting Jackson in the lead 99 to 84. When Jackson prevailed in the next election in 1828, it was the south that cemented his victory. The days of Virginia planters in the White House may have passed, but the slave south clearly dominated national politics and often served as antebellum kingmaker for the White House.

In any case, Adams’ dreams of vindicating his father’s single term were dashed.  A lesser man would have gone off into the exile of retirement, but Adams was to come back—and come back stronger than ever as a political figure to be reckoned with, distinguished by his fierce antislavery activism. His abhorrence of human bondage ran deep, and long preceded his return to Congress. And because he kept such a detailed journal, we have insight into his most personal convictions.

Musing once more about the Missouri Compromise, he confided to his diary his belief that a war over slavery was surely on the horizon that would ultimately result in its elimination:  “If slavery be the destined sword in the hand of the destroying angel which is to sever the ties of this Union … the same sword will cut in sunder the bonds of slavery itself.” [p173] He also wrote of his conversations with the fellow cabinet secretary he most admired at the time, South Carolina’s John C. Calhoun, who clearly articulated the doctrine of white supremacy that defined the south. To Adams’ disappointment, Calhoun told him that southerners did not believe the Declaration’s guarantees of universal rights applied to blacks, and “Calhoun maintained that racial slavery guaranteed equality among whites because it placed all of them above blacks.” [p175]

These diary entries from 1820 came to foreshadow the more crisis-driven politics in the decades hence when Adams—his unhappy presidency long behind him—was the leading figure in Congress who stood against the south’s “peculiar institution” and southern domination of national politics. These were, of course, far more fraught times. He opposed both Texas annexation and the Mexican War, which he correctly viewed as a conflict designed to extend slavery. But he most famously led the opposition against the 1836 resolution known as the “gag rule” that prohibited House debate on petitions to abolish slavery, which incensed the north and spawned greater polarization. Adams was eventually successful, and the gag rule was repealed, but not until 1844.

It has long been my goal to read at least one biography of each American president, and I came to Cooper’s book with that objective in mind.  I found my time with it a deeply satisfying experience, although I suspect because it is so pregnant in detail it will find less appeal among a more popular audience.  Still, if you want to learn about this too often overlooked critical figure and at the same time gain a greater understanding of an important era in American history, I would highly recommend that you turn to The Lost Founding Father.

——————————————

Note: I reviewed the referenced Alan Taylor work here: Review of: American Republics: A Continental History of the United States, 1783-1850, by Alan Taylor

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

PODCAST Review of Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army During the Civil War, by Colin Edward Woodward

27 Sunday Feb 2022

Posted by stanprager in https://regarp.com/regarp-bookblogpod/

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Am..., Book Reviews, Books, Civil War, Regarp, Stan Prager

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-jnya6-11b9f84

Review of  Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army During the Civil War, by Colin Edward Woodward

Reviewed by Stan Prager, Regarp Book Blog

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Review of: Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army During the Civil War, by Colin Edward Woodward

Featured

Posted by stanprager in Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Early in the war … a Union squad closed in on a single ragged Confederate, and he obviously didn’t own any slaves. He couldn’t have much interest in the Constitution or anything else. And said: “What are you fighting for, anyhow?” they asked him. And he said: “I’m fighting because you’re down here.” Which is a pretty satisfactory answer.

That excerpt is from Ken Burns’ epic The Civil War (1990) docuseries, Episode 1, “The Cause.” It was delivered by the avuncular Shelby Foote in his soft, reassuring—some might say mellifluous—cadence, the inflection decorated with a pronounced but gentle southern accent. As professor of history James M. Lundberg complains, Foote, author of a popular Civil War trilogy who was himself not a historian, “nearly negates Burns’ careful 15-minute portrait of slavery’s role in the coming of the war with a 15-second” anecdote.  Elsewhere, Foote rebukes the scholarly consensus that slavery was the central cause for secession and the conflict it spawned that would take well over 600,000 American lives.

While all but die-hard “Lost Cause” myth fanatics have relegated Foote’s ill-conceived dismissal of the centrality of slavery to the dustbin of history, the notion that southern soldiers fought solely for home and hearth has long persisted, even among historians. And on the face of it, it seems as if it should be true. After all, secession was the work of a narrow slice of the antebellum south, the slave-owning planter class which only comprised less than two percent of the population but dominated the political elite, in fury that Lincoln’s election by “Free-Soil” Republicans would likely deny their demands to transplant their “peculiar institution” to the new territories acquired in the Mexican War. More critically, three-quarters of southerners owned no slaves at all, and nearly ninety per cent of the remainder owned twenty or fewer. Most whites lived at the margins as yeoman farmers, although their skin color ensured a status markedly above those of blacks, free or enslaved. The Confederate army closely reflected that society: most rebel soldiers were not slaveowners.  So slavery could not have been important to them … or could it?

The first to challenge the assumption that Civil War soldiers, north or south, were political agnostics was James M. McPherson in What They Fought For 1861-1865 (1995). Based on extensive research on letters written home from the front, McPherson argued that most of those in uniform were far more ideological than previously acknowledged. In a magnificent contribution to the historiography, Colin Edward Woodward goes much further in Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army During the Civil War (2014), presenting compelling evidence that not only were most gray-clad combatants well-informed about the issues at stake, but a prime motivating force for a majority was to preserve the institution of human chattel bondage and the white supremacy that defined the Confederacy.

Like McPherson, Woodward does a deep dive into the wealth of still extant letters from those at the front to make his case in a deeply researched and well-written narrative that reveals that the average rebel was surprisingly well-versed in the greater issues manifested in the debates that launched an independent Confederacy and justified the blood and treasure being spent to sustain it. And just as in secession, the central focus was upon preserving a society that had its foundation in chattel slavery and white supremacy. Some letters were penned by those who left enslaved human beings—many or just a few—back at home with their families when they marched off to fight, while most were written by poor dirt farmers who had no human property nor the immediate prospect of obtaining any.

But what is fully astonishing, as Woodward exposes in the narrative, is not only how frequently slavery and the appropriate status for African Americans is referenced in such correspondence, but how remarkably similar the language is, whether the soldier is the son of a wealthy planter or a yeoman farmer barely scraping by. In nearly every case, the righteousness of their cause is defined again and again not by the euphemism of “states’ rights” that became the rallying cry of “Lost Cause” after the war, but by the sanctity of the institution of human bondage. More than once, letters resound with a disturbing yet familiar refrain that asserted that the most fitting condition for blacks is as human property, something seen as mutually beneficial to the master as well as to the enslaved.

If those without slaves risking life and limb to sustain slavery with both musket in hand and zealous declarations in letters home provokes a kind of cognitive dissonance to modern ears, we need only be reminded of our own contemporaries in doublewides who might sound the most passionate defense of Wall Street banks.  Have-nots in America often aspire to what is beyond their reach, for themselves or for their children. For poor southern whites of the time, in and out of the Confederate army, that turns out to be slave property.

One of the greatest sins of postwar reconciliation and the tenacity of the “Lost Cause” was the erasure of African Americans from history. In the myth-making that followed Appomattox, with human bondage extinct and its practice widely reviled, the Civil War was transformed into a sectional war of white brother against white brother, and blacks were relegated to roles as bit players. The centrality of slavery was excised from the record. In the literature, blacks were generally recalled as benign servants loyal to their masters, like the terrified Prissy in Gone with the Wind screeching “De Yankees is comin!” in distress rather than the celebration more likely characteristic to that moment in real time. That a half million of the enslaved fled to freedom in Union lines was lost to memory. Also forgotten was the fact that by the end of the war, fully ten percent of the Union Army was comprised of black soldiers in the United States Colored Troops (USCT)—and these men played a significant role in the south’s defeat.  Never mentioned was that Confederate soldiers routinely executed black men in blue uniforms who were wounded or attempting to surrender, not only in well-known encounters like at Fort Pillow and the Battle of the Crater, but frequently and anonymously. As Woodward reminds us, this brand of murder was often unofficial, but rarely acknowledged, and almost never condemned. Only recently have these aspects of Civil War history received the attention that is their due.

And yet, more remarkably, Marching Masters reveals that perhaps the deepest and most enduring erasure of African Americans was of the huge cohort that accompanied the Confederate army on its various campaigns throughout the war. Thousands and thousands of them. “Lost Cause” zealots have imagined great corps of “Black Confederates” who served as fighters fending off Yankee marauders, but if that is fantasy—and it certainly is—the massive numbers of blacks who served as laborers alongside white infantry were not only real but represented a significant reason why smaller forces of Confederates held out as well as they did against their often numerically superior northern opponents. We have long known that a greater percentage of southerners were able to join the military than their northern counterparts because slave labor at home in agriculture and industry freed up men to wield saber and musket, but Woodward uncovers the long-overlooked legions of the enslaved who travelled with the rebels performing the kind of labor that (mostly) fell on white enlisted men in northern armies.

A segment of these were also personal servants to the sons of planters, which sometimes provoked jealousy among the ranks. Certain letters home plead for just such a servile companion, sometimes arguing that the enslaved person would be less likely to flee to Union lines if he was to be a cook in an army camp instead! And there were occasionally indeed tender if somewhat perversely paternalistic bonds between the homesick soldier and the enslaved, some of which found wistful expression in letters, some manifested in relationships with servants in the encampments. Many soldiers had deep attachments to the enslaved that nurtured them as children in the bosom of their families; some of that was sincerely reciprocated. Woodward makes it clear that while certain generalities can be drawn, every individual—soldier or chattel—was a human being capable of a wide range of actions and emotions, from the cruel to the heartwarming. For better or for worse, all were creatures of their times and their circumstances. But, at the end of the day, white soldiers had something like free will; enslaved African Americans were subject to the will of others, sometimes for the better but more often for the worse.

And then there was impressment. One of the major issues relatively unexplored in the literature is the resistance of white soldiers in the Confederate army to perform menial labor—the same tasks routinely done by white soldiers in the Union army, who grumbled as all those in the ranks in every army were wont to do while nevertheless following orders. But southern boys were different. Nurtured in a society firmly grounded in white supremacy, with chattel property doomed to the most onerous toil, rebels not only typically looked down upon hard work but—as comes out in their letters—equated it with “slavery.” To cope with this and an overall shortage of manpower, legislation was passed in 1863 mandating impressment of the enslaved along with a commitment of compensation to owners.  This was not well received, but yet enacted, and thousands more blacks were sent to camps to do the work soldiers were not willing to do.

The numbers were staggering. When Lee invaded Pennsylvania, his army included 6000 enslaved blacks—which added an additional ten percent to the 60,000 infantry troops he led to Gettysburg! This of course does not include the runaways and free blacks his forces seized and enslaved after he crossed the state line. The point to all of this, of course, is that slavery was not some ideological abstraction for the average rebel soldier in the ranks, something that characterized the home front, whether your own family were owners of chattel property or not. Instead, the enslaved were with you in the field every day, not figuratively but in the flesh. With this in mind, sounding a denial that slavery served as a critical motivation for Confederate troops rings decidedly off-key.

While slavery was the central cause of the war, it was certainly not the only cause. There were other tensions that included agriculture vs. industry, rural vs. urban, states’ rights vs. central government, tariffs, etc. But as historians have long concluded, none of these factors on their own could ever have led to Civil War. Likewise, southern soldiers fought for a variety of reasons. While plenty were volunteers, many were also drafted into the war effort. Like soldiers from ancient times to the present day, they fought because they were ordered to, because of their personal honor, because they did not want to appear cowardly in the eyes of their companions. And because much of the war was decided on southern soil, they also fought for their homeland, to defend their families, to preserve their independence. So Shelby Foote might have had a point. But what was that independence based upon? It was fully and openly based upon creating and sustaining a proud slave republic, as all the rhetoric in the lead-up to secession loudly underscored.

Marching Masters argues convincingly that the long-held belief that southern soldiers were indifferent to or unacquainted with the principles that guided the Confederate States of America is in itself a kind of myth that encourages us to not only forgive those who fought for a reprehensible cause but to put them on a kind of heroic pedestal. Many fought valiantly, many lost their lives, and many were indeed heroes, but we must not overlook the cause that defined that sacrifice.  In this, we must recall the speech delivered by the formerly enslaved Frederick Douglass on “Remembering the Civil War” with his plea against moral equivalency that is as relevant today as it was when he delivered it on Decoration Day in 1878: “There was a right side and a wrong side in the late war, which no sentiment ought to cause us to forget, and while today we should have malice toward none, and charity toward all, it is no part of our duty to confound right with wrong, or loyalty with treason.”

For all of the more than 60,000 books on the Civil War, there still remains a great deal to explore and much that has long been cloaked in myth for us to unravel. It is the duty not only of historians but for all citizens of our nation—a nation that was truly reborn in that tragic, bloody conflict—to set aside popular if erroneous notions of what led to that war, as well as what motivated its long-dead combatants to take up arms against one another. To that end, Woodward’s Marching Masters is a book that is not only highly recommended but is most certainly required reading.

 

——————————-

Transcript of The Civil War (1990) docuseries, Episode 1, “The Cause:” https://subslikescript.com/series/The_Civil_War-98769/season-1/episode-1-The_Cause

Comments by James M. Lundberg: https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/06/civil-war-sentimentalism/240082/

Speech by Frederick Douglass, “Remembering the Civil War,” delivered on Decoration Day 1878:   https://www.americanyawp.com/reader/reconstruction/frederick-douglass-on-remembering-the-civil-war-1877/

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

PODCAST Review of Sarah’s Long Walk: The Free Blacks of Boston and How Their Struggle for Equality Changed America, by Stephen Kendrick & Paul Kendrick

20 Sunday Feb 2022

Posted by stanprager in https://regarp.com/regarp-bookblogpod/

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

African Americ..., American History, Book Reviews, Books

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-8gfkr-11b067a

Review of  Sarah’s Long Walk: The Free Blacks of Boston and How Their Struggle for Equality Changed America, by Stephen Kendrick & Paul Kendrick

Reviewed by Stan Prager, Regarp Book Blog

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Review of: Sarah’s Long Walk: The Free Blacks of Boston and How Their Struggle for Equality Changed America, by Stephen Kendrick & Paul Kendrick

Featured

Posted by stanprager in Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

Several years ago, I published an article in a scholarly journal entitled “Strange Bedfellows: Nativism, Know-Nothings, African-Americans & School Desegregation in Antebellum Massachusetts,” that spotlighted the odd confluence of anti-Irish nativism and the struggle to desegregate Boston schools. The Know-Nothings—a populist, nativist coalition that contained elements that would later be folded into the emerging Republican Party—made a surprising sweep in the Massachusetts 1854 elections, fueled primarily by anti-Irish sentiment, as well as a pent-up popular rage against the elite status quo that had long dominated state politics. Suddenly, the governor, all forty senators, and all but three house representatives were Know-Nothings!

Perhaps more startling was that during their brief tenure, the Know-Nothing legislature enacted a host of progressive reforms, creating laws to protect workingmen, ending imprisonment for debt, strengthening women’s rights in property and marriage, and—most significantly—passing landmark legislation in 1855 that “prohibited the exclusion [from public schools] of children for either racial or religious reasons,” which effectively made Massachusetts the first state in the country to ban segregation in schools! Featured in the debate prior to passage of the desegregation bill is a quote from the record that is to today’s ears perhaps at once comic and cringeworthy, as one proponent of the new law sincerely voiced his regret “that Negroes living on the outskirts . . . were forced to go a long distance to [the segregated] Smith School. . . while . . . the ‘dirtiest Irish,’ were allowed to step from their houses into the nearest school.”

My article focused on Massachusetts politics and the bizarre incongruity of nativists unexpectedly delivering the long sought-after prize of desegregated schools to the African American community. It is also the story of the nearly forgotten black abolitionist and integrationist William Cooper Nell, a mild if charismatic figure who united disparate forces of blacks and whites in a long, stubborn, determined campaign to end Boston school segregation. But there are lots of other important stories of people and events that led to that moment which due to space constraints could not receive adequate treatment in my effort.

Arguably the most significant one, which my article references but does not dwell upon, centers upon a little black girl named Sarah Roberts.  Her father, Benjamin R. Roberts, sued for equal protection rights under the state constitution because his daughter was barred from attending a school near her residence and was compelled to a long walk to the rundown and crowded Smith School instead. He was represented by Robert Morris, one of the first African American attorneys in the United States, and Charles Sumner, who would later serve as United States Senator. In April 1850, in Roberts v. The City of Boston, the state Supreme Court ruled against him, declaring that each locality could decide for itself whether to have or end segregation. This ruling was to serve as an unfortunate precedent for the ignominious separate but equal ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson some decades hence and was also an obstacle Thurgood Marshall had to surmount when he successfully argued to have the Supreme Court strike down school segregation across the nation in 1954’s breakthrough Brown v. Board of Education case—just a little more than a century after the disappointing ruling in the Roberts case.

Father and son Stephen Kendrick and Paul Kendrick teamed up to tell the Roberts story and a good deal more in Sarah’s Long Walk: The Free Blacks of Boston and How Their Struggle for Equality Changed America, an extremely well-written, comprehensive, if occasionally slow-moving chronicle that recovers for the reader the vibrant, long overlooked black community that once peopled Boston in the years before the Civil War. In the process, the authors reveal how it was that while the state of Massachusetts offered the best overall quality of life in the nation for free blacks, it was also the home to the same stark, virulent racism characteristic of much of the north in the antebellum era, a deep-seated prejudice that manifested itself not only in segregated schools but also in a strict separation in other arenas such as transportation and theaters.

Doctrines of abolition were widely despised, north and south, and while abolitionists remained a minority in Massachusetts, as well, it was perhaps the only state in the country where antislavery ideology achieved widespread legitimacy. But true history is all nuance, and those who might rail passionately against the inherent evil in holding humans as chattel property did not necessarily also advance notions of racial equality. That was indeed far less common. Moreover, it is too rarely underscored that the majority of northern “Freesoilers” who were later to become the most critical component of the Republican Party vehemently opposed the spread of slavery to the new territories acquired in the Mexican War while concomitantly despising blacks, free or enslaved.

At the same time, there was hardly unanimity in the free black community when it came to integration; some blacks welcomed separation.  Still, as Sarah’s Long Walk relates, there were a number of significant African American leaders like Robert Morris and William Cooper Nell whom, with their white abolitionist allies, played the long game and pursued compelling, nonviolent mechanisms to achieve both integration and equality, many of which presaged the tactics of Martin Luther King and other Civil Rights figures a full century later.  For instance, rather than lose hope after the Roberts court decision, Nell doubled down his efforts, this time with a new strategy—a taxpayer’s boycott of Boston which saw prominent blacks move out of the city to suburbs that featured integrated schools, depriving Boston of tax revenue.

The Kendrick’s open the narrative with a discussion of Thurgood Marshall’s efforts to overturn the Roberts precedent in Brown v. Board of Education, and then trace that back to the flesh and blood Boston inhabitants who made Roberts v. The City of Boston possible, revealing the free blacks who have too long been lost to history. Readers not familiar with this material will come across much that will surprise them between the covers of this fine book. The most glaring might be how thoroughly in the decades after Reconstruction blacks have been erased from our history, north and south. Until recently, how many growing up in Massachusetts knew anything at all about the thriving free black community in Boston, or similar ones elsewhere above the Mason-Dixon?

But most astonishing for many will be the fact that the separation of races that that would become the new normal in the post-Civil War “Jim Crow” south had its roots fully nurtured in the north decades before Appomattox.  Whites and their enslaved chattels shared lives intertwined in the antebellum south, while separation between whites and blacks was fiercely enforced in the north.  Many African Americans in Massachusetts had fled bondage, or had family members that were runaways, and knew full well that southern slaveowners commonly traveled by rail accompanied by their enslaved servants, while free blacks in Boston were relegated to a separate car until the state prohibited racial segregation in mass transportation in 1842.

Sarah may not have been spared her long walk to school, but the efforts of integrationists eventually paid off when school segregation was prohibited by Massachusetts law just five years after Sarah’s father lost his case in court. Unfortunately, this battle had to be waged all over again in the 1970s, this time accompanied by episodes of violence, as Boston struggled to achieve educational equality through controversial busing mandates that in the long term generated far more ill will than sustainable results. Despite the elevation of Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court bench, and the election of the first African American president, more than one hundred fifty years after the Fourteenth Amendment became the law of the land, the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement reminds us that there is still much work to be done to achieve anything like real equality in the United States.

For historians and educators, an even greater concern these days lies in the concerted efforts by some on the political right to erase the true story of African American history from public schools. As this review goes to press in Black History Month, February 2022, shameful acts are becoming law across a number of states that by means of gaslighting legislation ostensibly designed to ban Critical Race Theory (CRT) effectively prohibit educators from teaching their students the true history of slavery, Reconstruction, and Civil Rights.  As of this morning, there are some one hundred thirteen other bills being advanced across the nation that could serve as potential gag orders in schools. How can we best combat that? One way is to loudly protest to state and federal officials, to insist that black history is also American history and should not be erased. The other is to freely share black history in your own networks. The best weapons for that in our collective arsenal are quality books like Sarah’s Long Walk.

 

My journal article, “Strange Bedfellows: Nativism, Know-Nothings, African-Americans & School Desegregation in Antebellum Massachusetts,” and related materials can be accessed by clicking here: Know-Nothings

For more about the Know-Nothings, I recommend this book which I reviewed here: Review of: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts: The Rise and Fall of a People’s Movement, by John R. Mulkern

 

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

PODCAST Review of Into the Heart of the World: A Journey to the Center of the Earth, by David Whitehouse

05 Saturday Feb 2022

Posted by stanprager in https://regarp.com/regarp-bookblogpod/

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Book Reviews, Books, History, Regarp, Stan Prager

https://www.podbean.com/media/share/pb-gy3cf-119bd9a

Review of  Into the Heart of the World: A Journey to the Center of the Earth, by David Whitehouse

Reviewed by Stan Prager, Regarp Book Blog

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Review of: Into the Heart of the World: A Journey to the Center of the Earth, by David Whitehouse

Featured

Posted by stanprager in Reviews

≈ Leave a comment

A familiar trope in the Looney Tunes cartoons of my boyhood had Elmer Fudd or some other zany character digging a hole with such vigor and determination that they emerged on the other side of the world in China, greeted by one or more of the stereotypically racist Asian animated figures of the day.  In the 1964 Road Runner vehicle “War and Pieces,” Wile E. Coyote goes it one better, riding a rocket clear through the earth—presumably passing through its center—until he appears on the other side dangling upside down, only to then encounter a Chinese Road Runner embellished with a braided pigtail and conical hat who bangs a gong with such force that he is driven back through the tunnel to end up right where he started from. In an added flourish, the Chinese Road Runner then peeps his head out of the hole and beep-beep’s faux Chinese characters that turn into letters that spell “The End.”

There were healthy doses of both hilarious comedy and uncomfortable caricature here, but what really stuck in a kid’s mind was the notion that you could somehow burrow through the earth with a shovel or some explosive force, which it turns out is just as impossible in 2022 as it was in 1964. But if you hypothetically wanted to give it a go, you would have to start at China’s actual antipode in this hemisphere, which lies in Chile or Argentina, and then tunnel some 7,918 miles: twice the distance to the center of the earth you would pass through, which lies at around 3,959 miles (6,371 km) from the surface.

So what about the center of the earth? Could we go there? After all, we did visit the moon, and the average distance there—238,855 miles away—is far more distant.  But of course what lies between the earth and its single satellite is mostly empty space, not the crust, mantle, outer core, and inner core of a rocky earth that is a blend of the solid and the molten.  Okay, it’s a challenge, you grant, but how far have we actually made it in our effort to explore our inner planet? We must have made some headway, right? Well, it turns out that the answer is: not very much. A long, concerted effort at drilling that began in 1970 by the then Soviet Union resulted in a measly milestone of a mere 7.6 miles (12.3 km) at the Kola Superdeep Borehole near the Russian border with Norway; efforts were abandoned in 1994 because of higher-than-expected temperatures of 356 °F (180 °C). Will new technologies take us deeper one day at this site or another? Undoubtedly. But it likely will not be in the near future. After all, there’s another 3,951.4 miles to go and conditions will only grow more perilous at greater depths.

But we can dream, can’t we? Indeed. And it was Jules Verne who did so most famously when he imagined just such a trip in his classic 1864 science fiction novel, Journey to the Center of the Earth.  Astrophysicist and journalist David Whitehouse cleverly models his grand exploration of earth’s interior, Into the Heart of the World: A Journey to the Center of the Earth, on Verne’s tale, a well-written, highly accessible, and occasionally exciting work of popular science that relies on geology rather than fiction to transport the reader beneath the earth’s crust through the layers below and eventually to what we can theoretically conceive based upon the latest research as the inner core that comprises the planet’s center.

It is surprising just how few people today possess a basic understanding of the mechanics that power the forces of the earth.  But perhaps even more astonishing is how new—relatively—this science is. When I was a child watching Looney Tunes on our black-and-white television, my school textbooks admitted that although certain hypotheses had been suggested, the causes of sometimes catastrophic events such as earthquakes and volcanoes remained essentially unknown. All that changed effectively overnight—around the time my family got our first color TV—with the widespread acceptance by geologists of the theory of plate tectonics, constructed on the foundation of the much earlier hypothesis of German meteorologist and geophysicist Alfred Wegener, who in 1912 advanced the view of continents in motion known as “continental drift,” which was ridiculed in his time. By 1966, the long-dead Wegener was vindicated, and continental drift was upgraded to the more elegant model of plate tectonics that fully explained not only earthquakes and volcanoes, but mountain-building, seafloor spreading, and the whole host of other processes that power a dynamic earth.

Unlike some disciplines such as astrophysics, the basic concepts that make up earth science are hardly insurmountable to any individual with an average intelligence, so for those who have no idea how plate tectonics work and are curious enough to want to learn, Into the Heart of the World is a wonderful starting point. Whitehouse can be credited with articulating complicated processes in an easy to follow narrative that consistently holds the reader’s interest and remains fully comprehensible to the non-scientist. I came to this book with more than a passing familiarity with plate tectonics, but I nevertheless added to my knowledge base and enjoyed the way the author united disparate topics into this single theme of a journey to the earth’s inner core.

If I have a complaint, and as such it is only a quibble tied to my own preferences, Into the Heart of the World often devotes far more paragraphs to a history of “how we know what we know” rather than a more detailed explanation of the science itself. The author is not to be faulted for what is integral to the structure of the work—after all the cover does boast “A Remarkable Voyage of Scientific Discovery,” but it left me longing for more. Also, some readers may stumble over these backstories of people and events, eager instead to get to the fascinating essence of what drives the forces that shape our planet.

A running gag in more than one Bugs Bunny episode has the whacky rabbit inadvertently tunneling to the other side of the world, then admonishing himself that “I knew I shoulda taken that left turn at Albuquerque!”  He doesn’t comment on what turn he took at his juncture with the center of the earth, but many kids who sat cross-legged in front their TVs wondered what that trip might look like. For grownups who still wonder, I recommend Into the Heart of the World as your first stop.

 

[Note: this book has also been published under the alternate title, Journey to the Centre of the Earth: The Remarkable Voyage of Scientific Discovery into the Heart of Our World.]

[A link to the referenced 1964 Road Runner episode is here: War and Pieces]

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

FOLLOW

Follow Regarp Book Blog on WordPress.com

Regarp Book Blog on Facebook

Regarp Book Blog on Facebook

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 580 other subscribers

Recent Posts

  • PODCAST Review of: Chemistry for Breakfast: The Amazing Science of Everyday Life, by Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim April 27, 2022
  • Review of: Chemistry for Breakfast: The Amazing Science of Everyday Life, by Mai Thi Nguyen-Kim April 27, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of The Lost Founding Father: John Quincy Adams and the Transformation of American Politics, by William J. Cooper March 6, 2022
  • Review of: The Lost Founding Father: John Quincy Adams and the Transformation of American Politics, by William J. Cooper March 6, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army During the Civil War, by Colin Edward Woodward February 27, 2022
  • Review of: Marching Masters: Slavery, Race, and the Confederate Army During the Civil War, by Colin Edward Woodward February 27, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of Sarah’s Long Walk: The Free Blacks of Boston and How Their Struggle for Equality Changed America, by Stephen Kendrick & Paul Kendrick February 20, 2022
  • Review of: Sarah’s Long Walk: The Free Blacks of Boston and How Their Struggle for Equality Changed America, by Stephen Kendrick & Paul Kendrick February 20, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of Into the Heart of the World: A Journey to the Center of the Earth, by David Whitehouse February 5, 2022
  • Review of: Into the Heart of the World: A Journey to the Center of the Earth, by David Whitehouse February 5, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of Ancient Bones: Unearthing the Astonishing New Story of How We Became Human, by Madelaine Böhme, Rüdiger Braun, and Florian Breier January 30, 2022
  • Review of: Ancient Bones: Unearthing the Astonishing New Story of How We Became Human, by Madelaine Böhme, Rüdiger Braun, and Florian Breier January 30, 2022
  • Review of: George Washington: The Political Rise of America’s Founding Father, by David O. Stewart January 23, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of George Washington: The Political Rise of America’s Founding Father, by David O. Stewart January 23, 2022
  • PODCAST Review of American Republics: A Continental History of the United States, 1783-1850, by Alan Taylor December 11, 2021
  • Review of: American Republics: A Continental History of the United States, 1783-1850, by Alan Taylor December 11, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Superior: The Return of Race Science, by Angela Saini November 13, 2021
  • Review of: Superior: The Return of Race Science, by Angela Saini November 13, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Political Life, by Robert Dallek October 17, 2021
  • Review of: Franklin D. Roosevelt: A Political Life, by Robert Dallek October 17, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Flight to Freedom, by Ellen Oppenheimer August 27, 2021
  • Review of: Flight to Freedom, by Ellen Oppenheimer August 27, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Behind Putin’s Curtain: Friendships and Misadventures Inside Russia, by Stephan Orth August 15, 2021
  • Review of: Behind Putin’s Curtain: Friendships and Misadventures Inside Russia, by Stephan Orth August 15, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Tim & Tigon, by Tim Cope July 6, 2021
  • Review of: Tim & Tigon, by Tim Cope July 6, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of The Caucasus: An Introduction, by Thomas De Waal June 8, 2021
  • Review of: The Caucasus: An Introduction, by Thomas De Waal June 8, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of A History of Crete, by Chris Moorey May 19, 2021
  • Review of: A History of Crete, by Chris Moorey May 19, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of The Steppe and the Sea: Pearls in the Mongol Empire, by Thomas T. Allsen May 12, 2021
  • Review of: The Steppe and the Sea: Pearls in the Mongol Empire, by Thomas T. Allsen May 12, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of A World on Edge: The End of the Great War and the Dawn of a New Age, by Daniel Schönpflug May 2, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of A Tidewater Morning, by William Styron April 25, 2021
  • Review of: A Tidewater Morning, by William Styron April 25, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Africa: A Biography of the Continent, by John Reader April 17, 2021
  • Review of: Africa: A Biography of the Continent, by John Reader April 17, 2021
  • Review of: Hymns of the Republic: The Story of the Final Year of the American Civil War, by S.C. Gwynne March 16, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Hymns of the Republic: The Story of the Final Year of the American Civil War, by S.C. Gwynne March 16, 2021
  • Review of: A World on Edge: The End of the Great War and the Dawn of a New Age, by Daniel Schönpflug January 31, 2021
  • PODCAST Review of Liar Temptress Soldier Spy: Four Women Undercover in the Civil War, by Karen Abbott December 31, 2020
  • Review of: Liar Temptress Soldier Spy: Four Women Undercover in the Civil War, by Karen Abbott December 31, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of The Etruscans: Lost Civilizations, by Lucy Shipley November 22, 2020
  • Review of: The Etruscans: Lost Civilizations, by Lucy Shipley November 22, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Reaganland: America’s Right Turn 1976-1980, by Rick Perlstein October 31, 2020
  • Review of: Reaganland: America’s Right Turn 1976-1980, by Rick Perlstein October 31, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of The Awakening: A History of the Western Mind AD 500-1700, by Charles Freeman September 20, 2020
  • Review of: The Awakening: A History of the Western Mind AD 500-1700, by Charles Freeman September 20, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Seduction: Sex, Lies, and Stardom in Howard Hughes’s Hollywood, by Karina Longworth August 3, 2020
  • Review of: Seduction: Sex, Lies, and Stardom in Howard Hughes’s Hollywood, by Karina Longworth July 31, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82, by Elizabeth A. Fenn July 9, 2020
  • Review of: Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775-82, by Elizabeth A. Fenn July 9, 2020
  • Review of: Lamarck’s Revenge: How Epigenetics is Revolutionizing Our Understanding of Evolution’s Past and Present, by Peter Ward June 19, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Thomas Jefferson’s Education, by Alan Taylor June 9, 2020
  • Review of: Thomas Jefferson’s Education, by Alan Taylor June 9, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Imagine John Yoko, by John & Yoko Lennon May 1, 2020
  • Review of: The Testaments: The Sequel to The Handmaid’s Tale, by Margaret Atwood April 28, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of At the Heart of the White Rose: Letters and Diaries of Hans and Sophie Scholl April 21, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of The Phantom Atlas: The Greatest Myths, Lies and Blunders on Maps, by Edward Brooke-Hitching April 18, 2020
  • Review of: A Warning, by Anonymous April 14, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Korea: Where the American Century Began, by Michael Pembroke April 8, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of Working: Researching, Interviewing, Writing, by Robert A. Caro April 4, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of The Last Founding Father: James Monroe and a Nation’s Call to Greatness, by Harlow Giles Unger April 3, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of: America’s War for the Greater Middle East: A Military History, by Andrew J. Bacevich March 30, 2020
  • Review of: America’s War for the Greater Middle East: A Military History, by Andrew J. Bacevich March 30, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of: “The Bank War and the Partisan Press: Newspapers, Financial Institutions, and the Post Office in Jacksonian America,” by Stephen W. Campbell March 1, 2020
  • Review of: The Bank War and the Partisan Press: Newspapers, Financial Institutions, and the Post Office in Jacksonian America, by Stephen W. Campbell February 29, 2020
  • PODCAST Review of: “Embattled Freedom: Journeys through the Civil War’s Slave Refugee Camps,” by Amy Murrell Taylor February 1, 2020
  • Review of: The Last Founding Father: James Monroe and a Nation’s Call to Greatness, by Harlow Giles Unger January 26, 2020
  • Review of: Apollo 8: The Mission That Changed Everything, by Martin W. Sandler December 24, 2019
  • Review of: Engleby, by Sebastian Faulks November 30, 2019
  • PODCAST Review of: “Napoleon: A Life” by Adam Zamoyski November 14, 2019
  • Review of: Napoleon: A Life, by Adam Zamoyski November 14, 2019
  • Podcast Review of: “The Land Shall be Deluged in Blood: A New History of the Nat Turner Revolt” by Patrick H. Breen October 14, 2019
  • Review of: Working: Researching, Interviewing, Writing, by Robert A. Caro October 2, 2019
  • Review of: The Land Shall be Deluged in Blood: A New History of the Nat Turner Revolt, by Patrick H. Breen September 7, 2019
  • Review of: Korea: Where the American Century Began, by Michael Pembroke August 28, 2019
  • Review of: Hero of the Empire: The Boer War, a Daring Escape and the Making of Winston Churchill, by Candice Millard July 7, 2019
  • Review of: Embattled Freedom: Journeys through the Civil War’s Slave Refugee Camps, by Amy Murrell Taylor June 25, 2019
  • Review of: The War for the Common Soldier: How Men Thought, Fought and Survived in Civil War Armies, by Peter S. Carmichael May 27, 2019
  • Review of: Wanting, by Richard Flanagan May 14, 2019
  • Review of: Life in Deep Time: Darwin’s “Missing” Fossil Record, by J. William Schopf May 5, 2019
  • Review of Egypt: Lost Civilizations, by Christina Riggs April 13, 2019
  • Review of: The Phantom Atlas: The Greatest Myths, Lies and Blunders on Maps, by Edward Brooke-Hitching March 31, 2019
  • Review of: The Thin Light of Freedom: The Civil War and Emancipation in the Heart of America, by Edward L. Ayers March 24, 2019
  • Review of: Imagine John Yoko, by John & Yoko Lennon February 3, 2019
  • Review of: Presidents of War, by Michael Beschloss January 30, 2019
  • Review of: Kennedy and King: The President, the Pastor, and the Battle Over Civil Rights, by Steven Levingston December 31, 2018
  • Review of: Killing Commendatore, by Haruki Murakami December 10, 2018
  • Review of: Dinner in Camelot: The Night America’s Greatest Scientists, Writers, and Scholars Partied at the Kennedy White House, by Joseph A. Esposito November 18, 2018
  • Review of: Madison’s Gift: Five Partnerships that Built America, by David O. Stewart October 17, 2018
  • Review of: Fear: Trump in the White House, by Bob Woodward October 3, 2018
  • Review of: The Fearless Benjamin Lay: The Quaker Dwarf Who Became the First Revolutionary Abolitionist, by Marcus Rediker September 9, 2018
  • Review of: First Person: A Novel, by Richard Flanagan September 2, 2018
  • Review of: Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America, by Rick Perlstein August 28, 2018
  • Review of: The Soul of America: The Battle for Our Better Angels, by Jon Meacham June 24, 2018
  • Review of: Time Travel: A History, by James Gleick June 9, 2018
  • Review of: A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership, by James Comey May 21, 2018
  • Review of: At the Heart of the White Rose: Letters and Diaries of Hans and Sophie Scholl, edited by Inge Jens May 6, 2018
  • Review of: Gilgamesh: A New English Version, by Stephen Mitchell March 31, 2018
  • Review of: The Wars of Reconstruction: The Brief, Violent History of America’s Most Progressive Era, by Douglas R. Egerton March 26, 2018
  • Review of: The Loyal Son: The War in Ben Franklin’s House, by Daniel Mark Epstein February 26, 2018
  • Review of: Grant, by Ron Chernow February 3, 2018
  • Review of: In Search of the Lost Chord: 1967 and the Hippie Idea, by Danny Goldberg December 31, 2017
  • Review of: The Marriage of Cadmus and Harmony, by Roberto Calasso December 17, 2017
  • Review of Bush, by Jean Edward Smith December 10, 2017
  • Review of: JFK’S Last Hundred Days: The Transformation of a Man and the Emergence of a Great President, by Thurston Clarke November 22, 2017
  • Review of: The Whydah: A Pirate Ship Feared, Wrecked and Found, by Martin W. Sandler November 19, 2017
  • Review of: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts: The Rise and Fall of a People’s Movement, by John R. Mulkern October 5, 2017
  • Review of: Cannibalism: A Perfectly Natural History, by Bill Schutt September 30, 2017
  • Review of: Almost Human: The Astonishing Tale of Homo naledi and the Discovery that Changed Our Human Story, by Lee Berger and John Hawks September 12, 2017
  • Review of: The Iliad, by Homer, translated by Stephen Mitchell September 3, 2017
  • Review of: A Moveable Feast: The Restored Edition, by Ernest Hemingway August 26, 2017
  • Review of: Men Without Women, by Haruki Murakami July 12, 2017
  • Review of: The Indus: Lost Civilizations, by Andrew Robinson June 23, 2017
  • Review of: The Sound of One Hand Clapping, by Richard Flanagan June 4, 2017
  • Review of: Cradle of Life: The Discovery of Earth’s Earliest Fossils, by J. William Schopf May 14, 2017
  • Review of: Who Lost Russia?: How the World Entered a New Cold War, by Peter Conradi April 30, 2017
  • Review of: Across the River and into the Trees, by Ernest Hemingway April 20, 2017
  • Review of: Atlas of Slavery, by James Walvin March 26, 2017
  • Review of: Worst. President. Ever.: James Buchanan, the POTUS Rating Game, and the Legacy of the Least of the Lesser Presidents, by Robert Strauss March 8, 2017
  • Review of: Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln’s Legacy, by David O. Stewart February 19, 2017
  • Review of: The Price for Their Pound of Flesh: The Value of the Enslaved, from Womb to Grave, in the Building of a Nation, by Daina Ramey Berry February 11, 2017
  • Review of: Scars of Independence: America’s Violent Birth, by Holger Hoock February 4, 2017
  • Review of: The True Flag: Theodore Roosevelt, Mark Twain, and the Birth of American Empire, by Stephen Kinzer January 17, 2017
  • Review of: Civil War Poetry: An Anthology, edited by Paul Negri December 31, 2016
  • Review of: Rain: A Natural and Cultural History, by Cynthia Barnett December 26, 2016
  • Review of: Maude (1883-1993): She Grew Up with the Country, by Mardo Williams December 16, 2016
  • Review of: The Apache Wars: The Hunt for Geronimo, the Apache Kid, and the Captive Boy Who Started the Longest War in American History, by Paul Andrew Hutton November 24, 2016
  • Review of: In the Land of a Thousand Gods: A History of Asia Minor in the Ancient World, by Christian Marek November 17, 2016
  • Review of: American Revolutions: A Continental History, 1750-1804, by Alan Taylor October 30, 2016
  • Review of: The American President: From Teddy Roosevelt to Bill Clinton, by William E. Leuchtenburg October 16, 2016
  • Review of: The State of Jones, by Sally Jenkins and John Stauffer September 25, 2016
  • Review of: The Great Siege of Malta: The Epic Battle between the Ottoman Empire and the Knights of St. John, by Bruce Ware Allen September 5, 2016
  • Review of: Tara Revisited: Women, War & The Plantation Legend, by Catherine Clinton August 4, 2016
  • Review of: The Orlando, Florida, Civil Rights Movement: A Case Study in Cooperation and Communication, 1951-1971, by Fred Altensee July 4, 2016
  • Review of: New England Bound: Slavery and Colonization in Early America, by Wendy Warren June 26, 2016
  • Review of: 1920: The Year of the Six Presidents, by David Pietrusza June 4, 2016
  • Review of: On the Trail of Genghis Khan: An Epic Journey Through the Land of the Nomads, by Tim Cope May 8, 2016
  • Review of: Jefferson and Monticello: The Biography of a Builder, by Jack McLaughlin April 24, 2016
  • Review of: Battling the Gods: Atheism in the Ancient World, by Tim Whitmarsh April 17, 2016
  • Review of: An Ape’s View of Human Evolution, by Peter Andrews March 20, 2016
  • Review of: Hornswogglers, Fourflushers & Snake-Oil Salesmen: True Tales of the Old West’s Sleaziest Swindlers, by Matthew P. Mayo March 3, 2016
  • Review of: King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terrorism and Heroism in Colonial Africa, by Adam Hochschild February 27, 2016
  • Review of: The Internal Enemy: Slavery and the War in Virginia 1772-1832, by Alan Taylor February 9, 2016
  • Review of: This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War, by Drew Gilpin Faust January 31, 2016
  • Review of: Empire of Cotton: A Global History, by Sven Beckert January 2, 2016
  • Review of: Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir, by John Paul Stevens December 29, 2015
  • Review of: South of the Border, West of the Sun, by Haruki Murakami December 26, 2015
  • Review of: Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country, by Andrew J. Bacevich December 20, 2015
  • Review of: Welcome to Braggsville, by T. Geronimo Johnson December 12, 2015
  • Review of: Iron Rails, Iron Men, and the Race to Link the Nation: The Story of the Transcontinental Railroad, by Martin W. Sandler November 29, 2015
  • Review of: Hear the Wind Sing, and Pinball, 1973, by Haruki Murakami November 26, 2015
  • Review of: Kissinger’s Shadow: The Long Reach of America’s Most Controversial Statesman, by Greg Grandin November 21, 2015
  • Review of: About Grace, by Anthony Doerr November 2, 2015
  • Review of: Grant and Sherman: The Friendship That Won the Civil War, by Charles Bracelen Flood October 16, 2015
  • Review of: The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan by Rick Perlstein October 11, 2015
  • Review of: The Civil War of 1812: American Citizens, British Subjects, Irish Rebels, & Indian Allies by Alan Taylor October 1, 2015
  • Review of: A History of the World in Sixteen Shipwrecks, by Stewart Gordon September 13, 2015
  • Review of: After the Quake, by Haruki Murakami September 9, 2015
  • Review of: Shosha, by Isaac Bashevis Singer September 6, 2015
  • Review of: Vanished Ocean: How Tethys Reshaped the World, by Dorrik Stow August 15, 2015
  • Review of: Appomattox: Victory, Defeat, and Freedom at the End of the Civil War, by Elizabeth R. Varon August 13, 2015
  • Review of: All the Light We Cannot See, by Anthony Doerr July 26, 2015
  • Review of: Death of a River Guide, by Richard Flanagan July 23, 2015
  • Review of: The Killer Angels, by Michael Shaara July 19, 2015
  • Review of: Their Last Full Measure: The Final Days of the Civil War, by Joseph Wheelan July 13, 2015
  • Review of: Our Man in Charleston: Britain’s Secret Agent in the Civil War South, by Christopher Dickey June 21, 2015
  • Review of: Sputnik Sweetheart by Haruki Murakami May 30, 2015
  • Review of: Blood of the Tiger: A Story of Conspiracy, Greed, and the Battle to Save a Magnificent Species, by J.A. Mills May 25, 2015
  • Review of: Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman by Haruki Murakami May 17, 2015
  • Review of: The Closing of the Western Mind: The Rise of Faith and the Fall of Reason by Charles Freeman May 13, 2015
  • Review of: The Proud Tower: A Portrait of the World Before the War 1890-1914 by Barbara Tuchman May 2, 2015
  • Review of: Richmond Burning: The Last Days of the Confederate Capital by Nelson Lankford April 25, 2015
  • Review of: 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed, by Eric H. Cline April 11, 2015
  • Review of: Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania by Erik Larson April 2, 2015
  • Review of: The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 by Christopher Clark March 21, 2015
  • Review of: Gateway to Freedom: The Hidden History of the Underground Railroad, by Eric Foner March 1, 2015
  • Review of: Dominion of Memories: Jefferson, Madison & the Decline of Virginia by Susan Dunn February 9, 2015
  • Review of: North Korea: State of Paranoia by Paul French February 2, 2015
  • Review of: River Run Red: The Fort Pillow Massacre in the American Civil War, by Andrew Ward February 2, 2015
  • Review of: The Narrow Road to the Deep North, by Richard Flanagan February 2, 2015
  • Review of: Against Wind and Tide: The African American Struggle against the Colonization Movement, by Ousmane K. Power-Greene February 2, 2015
  • Blog is Born February 2, 2015

Pandora Podcasts

Regarp BookBlogPod

Listen to Regarp BookBlogPod on Pandora - Book Reviews & Essays

Apple Podcasts

‎Regarp BookBlogPod on Apple Podcasts

‎Book Reviews & Essays

Google Podcasts

Regarp BookBlogPod

Book Reviews & Essays

TuneIn

Listen to Regarp BookBlogPod on TuneIn

Regarp BookBlogPod podcast on demand - Book Reviews & Essays

RegarpBookBlogPod

Regarp BookBlogPod

Book Reviews & Essays...

Powered by WordPress.com.

 

Loading Comments...
 

    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    %d bloggers like this: